The White House

CBM's "Loving, Life-sparing" Public Service Campaign # 1 *

  Why Public Service Campaigns?

That is, why should Christ's Bride Ministries undertake to conduct national Public Service Campaigns, such as The Abortion - Breast Cancer Link (ABC-Link) Awareness campaign?

In a nutshell, the Why is this - Because the devastating truth of the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link cries out to be made known to the girls, young women, women of childbearing age, and all of those people who influence their decisions and actions to abort their babies, so that no more girls, young women, nor women of childbearing age will be seduced, coerced, fooled, or intimidated into permitting their babies to be aborted, without even being aware of the increased lifetime risk of contracting breast cancer that is associated with induced abortion.

The outrageous evil of the abortion racket and its low friends in high places concealing the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link from the girls, young women, women of childbearing age, it continues to prey upon, and their families and loved ones, demands to be told!

Long ago First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt commenting on publication of in-utero photographs of preborn babies stated, "some...feel that such information should be printed only in medical journals.  But [it] must be given in mediums the public sees or listens to or reads....  It is information to safeguard young people, to try to bring down the death rate of mothers and babies."

CBM concurs.

  In contemporary times, it has been asserted that reasonable guidelines concerning journalistic coverage should include the following criteria:

  1. Is it true? 
  2. Is it important?
  3. Do people have a 'right' to know of it?
  4. Do people need to know of it? (vs. should they be prevented from knowing of it?)

In earlier (but still modern) times, it was taught, proclaimed, & vowed that requisite guidelines for the journalistic profession included the following criteria:

  1. It is true (or at least, the journalist, in his heart, sincerely believe it is true).
  2. It is constructive & important.
  3. It is humanitarian.
  4. It is imbued with a single standard of cleanness and helpfulness.
  5. It performs a public service.
  6. It does not merit suppression, that is [i.e.] the public welfare does not require suppression of publication  (for instance, the security of the nation genuinely and legitimately requires suppression of it, such as [e.g.] specific details of battle plans, and other military secrets....)
  7. It is always unafraid.
  8. It is quickly indignant at injustice.
  9. It is unswayed by the appeal of privilege or the clamor of the mob.
  10. It Fears God and honors man!

Interestingly, it was held that the supreme test of good Journalism was its measure of public service!  

(Incredible, but true.  How terribly far today's "journalism" is from these good and godly standards of yesteryear, and how ruinously for we "the people"!) 

  We believe and know that these criteria for journalistic coverage, and the journalistic profession, are profoundly met, and exceeded, by the subjects addressed in CBM's public service campaigns; and thus the imperative necessity for undertaking these PSC's to communicate what today's purported "defenders of the public, and of the public's right to know" persist in refusing to report, much less to communicate prominently, widely, honestly, consistently, and conscientiously; indeed they have "reported" against/contrary to these life-preserving truths!  

Thus CBM has been compelled, at great sacrifice, to undertake to communicate life-saving truth, including warning the public of the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link, i.e., the increased life-time risk of contracting breast cancer and of contracting especially virulent (fast-killing), recurrent, early-onset strains of breast cancer, associated with induced abortion.

Once upon a time, a certain fallen, and disgraced political leader stated that "history would vindicate him."  CBM places no confidence in the "history" that is fashioned by the literary historical journalists of today and tomorrow, but we do know eternity will bear out the truth of what we have done and sought to do.

  Those who claim to be so concerned with women being educated regarding the most recent information on methods for preventing breast cancer, for decreasing the life-time risk of contracting breast cancer, and for the 'most effective' methods for treating breast cancer, interestingly insist that women must be "protected" from learning of the abortion - breast cancer link [the ABC-Link], i.e. they insist girls, young women, & women of childbearing age must be kept ignorant of the abortion - breast cancer link, or lied to about it.

Why?  Why do you think that is?  Why do you suppose?

Astoundingly, they insist that women are not capable of properly 'dealing' with this information, and frankly cannot be trusted with it; that they must be shielded from it, that the ABC-Link information must be censoriously kept from girls, young women, women of child-bearing age, and from all those who may influence their 'informed' decision-making regarding 'choosing' elective abortion.

Could the abortion 'industry,' i.e. the abortion racket, the affiliated vested interests, and the abortion-promoting forces possibly have an axe to grind at your expense and at that of girls, young women, and women of childbearing age everywhere?  Do they have something to hide?

We think you deserve to know what has been discovered concerning the abortion - breast cancer link during more than four decades, yes over a span of more than forty years! without being communicated (much less, widely publicized) for the public to consider.

Instead, this information, the facts, the findings, have been deliberately concealed, denied, trivialized, scandalized, and slandered, and all in the guise of serving a girl's, a woman's, best interests.

It has been a long costly uphill battle for us to bring this vital life and death information to you, i.e. seven years in the making thus far.

Joel Brind, Ph.D., previously had noted that, "Putting it all together, the latest count of all published worldwide data specifically relating to induced abortion and breast cancer incidence has 24 out of 29 studies showing increased risk overall in the population studied."

[Please also consider why the information which Dr. Lorraine Day has diligently sought to educate the public of, has been effectively prevented from being publicized, again by the self-professed 'champions of the public's right to know.']

  If 'legalized' elective abortion is therapeutic, medicinal, safe...for the mother (which was the purported basis or rationale for the 'legalization' of induced abortion), then:

  1. Why is it that prior to legalization of abortion in America the incidence of breast cancer in women was recognized to be 1 in 14, and now it is recognized to be 1 in 8 (practically a doubling)?
  2. How can you account for virtually a doubling in the incidence of breast cancer within considerably less than one single generation (as the dramatic increase in incidence has been noted for years now), while adamantly insisting that it cannot possibly be attributable to the 'quantum' leap in the prevalence of abortion witnessed during this same period of time?
  3. Why is the incidence of breast-cancer higher for those who have chosen to abort, or who have had others choose for them to abort, than it is for the general population of women, if abortion is not responsible?
  4. Why is there a more virulent, recurrent strain of breast cancer associated with those who have aborted one or more babies, but not associated with women who have not undergone abortion procedures?
  5. Why has the age of onset of breast cancer fallen (while life-expectancy for the general population, including women, has risen)?
  6. Why is there an earlier onset of breast cancer seen with those who have aborted?
  7. Why are women as young as in their twenties now being stricken with breast cancer?!  
  8. How do you account for these remarkable changes, i.e. a great increase in the incidence of breast cancer, and a stunning lowering of age of onset of breast cancer, while at the same time, so much greater expenditures have been made on research, and public education, regarding prevention, detection, and treatment of breast cancer (which should have resulted in the exact opposite of what has happened)?
  9. Why has the lifetime risk of contracting breast cancer for black women soared since legalization and government funding of abortion?
  10. How is it that in less than one generation black women have gone from enjoying a significantly lower lifetime risk of contracting breast cancer than white women, to suffering a significantly higher lifetime risk of contracting breast cancer than white women?!  [and this while white women's risk has also increased]
  11.   Why is it that incidence of breast cancer has soared world-wide, while the officially recognized risk factors and purported risk factors associated with breast cancer have not been seen universally, but an enormous increase in the officially denied risk factor abortion is witnessed universally, e.g. in Russia, China, Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Italy, Greece, Israel, the USA?
  12.   Why is it that the one glaring common thread risk-factor abortion is evidenced absolutely everywhere that breast cancer has become epidemic?
  13.   How can anyone dare to deny the ABC-Link, when there is so much published documented evidence of it, going back 44 years now, while also stating that "we do not know what causes breast cancer"?
  14.   How can anyone dare to insist that there is no ABC-Link, while they flip-flop over whether smoking is a risk factor?
  15.   How can anyone that claims smoking is the Number one avoidable risk factor for breast cancer by perhaps adding as much as 25% probability to a woman's likelihood of contracting breast cancer, deny induced abortion is an even greater avoidable breast-cancer risk factor, which conservatively increases a woman's lifetime risk by 30%?
  16.   How can any person or organization dare to insist that there is no increased risk of contracting breast cancer for those who have undergone abortions, and thus have delayed the time of their first delivery of a baby, or even been rendered unable to conceive or carry a baby to term, while at the same time having to admit the fact that there definitely is increased risk of contracting breast cancer for women who have not had children, or who have had their first children after the age of 30?
  17.   How can any person or organization dare to insist that there is no increased risk of contracting breast cancer associated with induced abortion, when it has been known for so many decades that lifetime risk of breast cancer is reduced by approximately two-thirds for women who have given birth at a young age and continued to give birth to children, when induced abortion prevents giving birth of children, and indeed can destroy the ability to conceive and give birth, and when induced abortion is most commonly resorted to, to prevent development, growth, and birth of first babies?
  18.   Why is it that women who are diagnosed as having breast cancer while they are pregnant are routinely advised to abort their babies, even though studies show aborting the babies to be disastrous for the women's survival, i.e. the very worst possible course to follow?
  19.   Why is it that women who become pregnant after having had breast cancer are typically advised to abort their babies, even though studies show that carrying the pregnancies to term is better for the women's survival?
  20.   Why is it responsible, professional, and compassionate for medical professionals to use their position, influence, and persuasion to recommend that young, healthy, disease-free women with a family history of breast cancer undergo expensive, maiming, mutilating, defeminizing, life-damaging, radical 'prophylactic' dual mastectomies, and dual oophorectomies (surgical removal of ovaries, female castration), to purportedly prevent these healthy young women from possibly contracting breast cancer, sometime in the indeterminate future, while it is "anti-woman terrorism" to communicate the truth of the abortion - breast cancer link, so that girls, young women, and women of childbearing age might be informed of the breast cancer risks directly associated with abortion, prior to electing to "choose" abortion?
  21.   Why is it so popular in the media to communicate any 'news' about breast cancer, while it is utterly taboo to communicate word of the long-established truth of the abortion - breast cancer link?
  22.   Why is it that the major media reports on none of these things, and chooses not to investigate any of these things?
  23.   Why is it that the major media when confronted with the truth of the abortion - breast cancer link, rather than honestly investigating it and reporting on it, instead actually engages only in the following: denial and black out - nonreporting, trivializing, and attack journalism - scandalizing and slandering? 

    Why?  What are they afraid of?  Are they afraid of the public learning the truth of the abortion - breast cancer link?

  24.   Do the ideological ties* of those controlling the major media have anything to do with their aversion to telling the truth about the abortion - breast cancer link? 

    [* The New York Times has perennially been a major supporter of Planned Parenthood, the largest 'provider' of abortion 'services' in America.]

  25.   Why is it that the government agencies responsible for breast cancer research, prevention, cures..., investigate none of these questions regarding a link between abortion and breast cancer, and report on none of these things?
  26.   Why is it that these same taxpayer-funded government agencies have actually engaged in attacking attempts to communicate the truth of the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link, when attempts have been made to inform taxpayers and all members of the public of the  abortion - breast cancer link?
  27.   If the government agencies: HHS and its branches NIH, CDC, NCI...actually reported the truth concerning the abortion - breast cancer link would it perhaps endanger the abortion 'industry's'* capacity to continue to receive enormous amounts of taxpayer extracted funding from the government?

    [* Planned Parenthood Federation of America perennially receives many tens of millions of dollars in funding from the U.S. Federal Government, which is annually taken from American taxpayers and redistributed to such monstrously anti-charitable organizations as Planned Parenthood.]

  28.   Why is it that the 'breast cancer prevention and cure' organizations and foundations persist in refusing to investigate or report on any of these things, yet continue to enjoy tremendously favorable media coverage?
  29.   Why is it that 'breast cancer prevention and cure' organizations actively oppose girls and women learning of the simplest and surest known means of preventing breast cancer, abstaining from abortion?
  30.   Why is it that 'breast cancer prevention and cure' organizations have collaborated with abortionist groups, and others, and literally lied about the abortion - breast cancer link, even denying that it exists, and in essence encouraging girls, young women, and women of childbearing age to go ahead and abort their babies?
  31.   Is it a coincidence that the Susan G. Komen Foundation which has lied about the ABC-Link, perennially chooses proudly aggressive abortion proponents like Al Gore, and Christine Todd Whitman for their figurehead national chairmen?
  32.   Why is it that abortion, the deliberate taking of innocent human life, enjoys such an extraordinarily exalted status as to forbid any investigation and reporting which might render unfavorable results?
  33.   For how many decades has the abortion 'industry' known of the heightened breast cancer risk associated with elective/induced  abortion?
  34.   Why do the abortion-pushing organizations keep viciously attacking abortion - breast cancer link findings?
  35.   Why is it that epidemiologists at the top of their profession who admit there definitely is an abortion - breast cancer link are afraid to speak out about it, for fear of reprisal and having their careers destroyed by the powers that be? 

    Why are these scientists being intimidated into silence?  And why doesn't the major media care about this censorship?

  36.   Why is it that the lives of girls, young women, and women matter so little as to fail to rate when compared to the 'survival' of the abortion 'industry'?
  37.   Why, why, one and one-half million times WHY in America per year alone, not to mention another 100 million times WHY world-wide per year?

  39.   Whether you are aware of it, or not, the abortion 'industry' has been doing everything in its power, with its enormous wealth, to prevent you from learning of the abortion - breast cancer link, as is seen in its concerted collaborative effort to stop CBM's "Loving, Life-sparing" PSC I (the ABC-Link public health risk disclosure service).  Why do you suppose that this is?

    The abortion 'industry's' feverish efforts notwithstanding, several states have now voted for right-to-know legislation requiring girls and women facing elective abortion, to be informed of the abortion - breast cancer link, with the following warning.

    Woman Doctor, Female Doctor


    Aborting any pregnancy, regardless of your age, increases your risk of developing breast cancer later in life.

    If you are under age 30 and have never had a full-term pregnancy, having an abortion also raises your breast cancer risk by preventing the natural lifetime reduction in breast cancer risk that you would obtain if you carry the child to term.

      The Biological Facts Support The ABC-Link [from Brind et al., JNCI (1997) 89:588-9]

    1. Estrogens are strong growth promoters of normal and most cancerous breast tissue.

    2. Most known risk factors for breast cancer are attributable to some form of estrogen overexposure.

    3. Maternal estradiol (estrogen) rises 20-fold (2,000 %) during the first trimester of a normal pregnancy, a hormonal influence reversed only in the third trimester.

    4. Pregnancies which abort spontaneously (miscarry) usually generate subnormal amounts of estradiol, and consequently no increased risk of breast cancer is seen in connection with miscarriages.

    5. The incidence of breast cancer is dramatically increased in rats whose pregnancies are aborted (as seen in laboratory studies dating back almost 20 years).

    According to Woman's World February 11, 1997 THE TOP LIFE-SAVER is avoiding cigarette smoke all the time.

    "If you smoke, there are powerful reasons to quit. Women smokers have a 25 percent greater risk of dying from breast cancer...."

    Note: This is stated as being the first of "powerful reasons to quit" (smoking), this is stated as a categorical fact, no reference is made to an amount of smoking (i.e. number of cigarettes smoked per day), nor a duration of smoking (i.e. number of years cigarettes smoked), associated with this alleged absolute 25% greater risk of dying from breast cancer, why not?; furthermore, no mention whatever is made of refraining from elective abortion, in order to achieve a greater reduction in risk of dying from breast cancer, than from refraining from smoking! Why not?!

    As shown in "A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis," published in the October 1996 issue of the British Medical Association's peer-reviewed Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, "Putting it all together, the latest count of all published worldwide data specifically relating to induced abortion and breast cancer incidence, has 24 out of 29 studies showing increased risk overall, in the population studied." The magnitude of increased risk conservatively was averaged as being between 30 and 40 percent greater for women having one or more induced abortions than for women not electing to abort their pregnancies. Various individual studies have demonstrated an increased incidence of breast cancer associated with induced abortion, ranging far in excess of this conservatively understated increase (e.g. 190% increase for women having one abortion, 260% for women having two or more abortions. Bu et al., 1995 from China. Yes, interestingly these results were gleaned from women in China, as were the results of a recent landmark study showing no preventive benefit for breast self-exams.

    One day perhaps the truth, that breast cancer prevention can best be summarized as abstaining from abortion will finally be told. [Unfortunately women in China do not have the freedom, do not have the right, to abstain from abortion.]

      Thus, to put it bluntly, "There are powerful reasons not to abort, even for women who choose to believe there is nothing wrong with abortion, nothing morally repugnant about abortion, nothing unacceptable about abortion."

    Abortion, no thanks, I can live without it, and so can my baby (babies).

    We look forward to the day when abstaining from abortion will be properly recognized by Woman's World, the medical profession, and people everywhere as truly THE TOP LIFE-SAVER.

      Some women have always chosen to live Dangerously.

    (but presumably these bull leapers knew what dangers they were facing)

    And some 'men' have always been only too willing to facilitate girls and women living dangerously.

      The following quote is from TV Newswoman Cokie Roberts,

    "I mean, I ALWAYS love the demographic figure on abortion.

    "The group most pro-choice in the country:

    "young men between the ages of 18 and 25.

    "The most responsible group, well known for taking, you know, responsibility for their actions."

    (Good Morning America, November 4, 1996)

    When is the last time you heard this bit of information during the past 46 years in which induced abortion has been 'legal' throughout the United States of America?  Why do you suppose that is?  As Cokie points out, this has been true for some time!

    Fascinatingly and ever so tellingly, this demographic, is the very same as the key demographic audience of Howard Stern!

    It might be added that some, or many, of these 'pro-choice' young 'men' never outgrow their love affair with abortion.

      One day perhaps the truth, that breast cancer prevention can best be summarized as abstaining from abortion will finally be told.

    Unfortunately women in China do not have the freedom, the right, to abstain from abortion.

      For these reasons, CBM has undertaken to warn the public at large generally, and girls, young women, and women of child-bearing age especially, of the ABC-Link danger associated with induced abortion, as the outdoor advertising samples herein attest.

    This effort has been attacked by the abortion 'industry,' and effectively aborted by the abortion racket, resulting in approximately 7.5 Million American girls, young women, and women of childbearing age undergoing induced abortion while being deliberately prevented from being forewarned of the abortion breast-cancer link ramification or side-effect, during the past six years, and that is without taking the rest of the world into account, so the figure should be increased by something like 600 Million, and yes a great many of these additional 600 Million girls, young women, and women of childbearing age would have known about the ABC-Link if the truth had been permitted to be successfully communicated in this nation, instead of being shut down and prevented by the abortion 'industry' and their low friends in high places.

    The abortion racket cover-up of the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link has been monstrously perpetuated for many years, and must be overcome, and to this end CBM will continue its efforts to warn girls, young women, and women of childbearing age away from self-destruction.  We hope we will prevail, for the sake of the girls, the young women, and the women of childbearing age, and all of their families and loved ones.

      Would you really rather not know?

    Perhaps you should be blaming those who have been lying to you and preventing you from learning the truth?

    Do you appreciate the conspiratorial collaborations of those who have deliberately prevented you from being warned of the abortion - breast cancer link? e.g. by PPFA, NAF, NARAL, NOW, NWHN....Donna Shalala's HHS (including NIH, CDC, and NCI), ACS-the American Cancer Society, and the major media, not to mention the flagrant failure to communicate the truth of the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link evidenced by the 'breast cancer foundations and organizations,' which are supposedly dedicated to finding a cure for breast cancer, notably the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (but what do you expect of organizations which are chaired by 'champions' of abortion, the likes of former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, former U.S. Vice-President Al Gore & Tipper; organizations which enjoy most favored status with the major media; organizations which are the recipients of so many millions and millions of dollars every year with which to use as they see fit to protect women from the breast cancer epidemic?  What do you expect?).

      Buttons Seen/Button Scene -

      Glimpses of CBM's "Loving, Life-sparing" Public Service Campaign I

    If you believe you should be trusted with making life & death choices for others, as in induced abortion, don't you believe you should be trusted with the truth of the ramifications to yourself resulting from such choices, as the abortion - breast cancer link?

    Could there possibly be a conspiracy?  If not a conspiracy, then what could it possibly be? 

    The pattern seen with the ABC-Link Cover-up is exactly the same as with the AIDS epidemic cover-up, and interestingly many of the same major parties are involved.  So what is the pattern?  Just this, Breast Cancer and AIDS are the two most politically correct cause celebres there are: 

    they receive instant front page, headline, top billing, or lead story treatment from the major media in response to any story or even tidbit about them, with the glaring exceptions of the forbidden, i.e. the unmentionable causation factors abortion and sodomy, that rock the boat of the ideologically left-wing media elites;

    they receive most favored funding status from leftist foundations and corporate givers, as long as there is no danger of the aforementioned unmentionable causation factors being addressed;

    the myriad efforts to prevent, detect, cure, and eradicate these destructive diseases are supervised by the same 'omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent' federal government departments  and agencies, e.g. HHS, and its tentacles, CDC, NIH, & NCI,... which report to the White House;

    any mention of the unmentionable causation factors which should manage to leak out is viciously attacked and denounced, spun, and controlled by members of the media, and the dominant leftist organizations, e.g. PPFA, NOW, NARAL, NAF, the Gay and Lesbian Task Force....

    and the list goes on, but suffice to say, that the abortion agenda and the sodomite agenda share remarkable similarities, allies, influence, power, resources, modus operandi, and tragically ruinous 'success;' at the expense of we people.

      Quotations from renowned journalists of yesteryear apply.

    Words from journalists who were of a different era, and of a different spirit indeed.

      "One who finds a truth, lights a torch."

      Joseph Pulitzer - "Our republic and its press will rise or fall together.  An able, disinterested, public-spirited press, with trained intelligence to know the right and courage to do it, can preserve that public virtue without which popular government is a sham and a mockery.

    "A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as base as itself.  The power to mould the future of the republic will be in the hands of the journalists of future generations."

    (This inscription is on a plaque "Presented to the National Press Club by the Graduate School of Journalism of Columbia University in commemoration of the school's fiftieth anniversary.")

      Walter Williams, Dean, School of Journalism, University of Missouri, 1908-1935 

    The Journalist's Creed

    "I believe in the profession of Journalism.

    "I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of their responsibility, trustees for the public; that acceptance of a lesser service than the public service is betrayal of this trust.

    "I believe that clear thinking and clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism.

    "I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true.

    "I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible.

    "I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one's own pocketbook is as much to be avoided as bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another's instructions or another's dividends.

    "I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that the supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service.

    "I believe that the journalism which succeeds best - and best deserves success - fears God and honors man; is stoutly independent, unmoved by pride of opinion or greed of power; constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient, always respectful of its readers -- but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice; is unswayed by the appeal of privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance, and, as far as law and honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship; is a journalism of humanity, of and for today's world."

    (This inscription is on a plaque "Presented to the National Press Club on its fiftieth anniversary by the Washington Alumni of the School of Journalism, University of Missouri, on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the World's first school of Journalism - 1958.") 

    The above cited plaques adorn the foyer of the National Press Club, located on the 13th floor of the National Press Building (a couple blocks from the White House) in Washington, D.C., USA.

    [Though it was the first school of Journalism in the world, and located in the very same state in which she worked as a newspaper journalist, it came along too late for my mother's mother's mother to attend.  Following his return from WWII, my father attended & graduated from another major school of Journalism.]

    I will leave it with the reader to decide which type of press we are currently 'blessed' with, and/or deceived, manipulated, controlled, and pressed under by, in the USA of Today.

      The "Loving, Life-sparing" Public Service Campaigns have been necessitated by major media of precisely the frame of press and journalists that Joseph Pulitzer warned of, in concert with virtueless, shameful, 'popularly' base government produced and/or permitted by such immoral press corps.

    Editor's note: By "disinterested," Joseph Pulitzer did not mean uncaring, callous, insensitive, nor heartless, ..., but rather he meant objective, uncorrupted, honest, conscientious, ..., and free from being influenced and controlled by 'special interests' which are opposed to truth, righteousness, virtue, justice, and the good of humanity.

    Ultrasound, Sonogram

    . There are medical procedures, treatments, therapies, 'remedies', but all true medicine attends to protecting, preserving, nurturing, nourishing, and prolonging life.  That which deliberately destroys life is a profound misuse of medical knowledge, and methods, and as such used to be forbidden within the practice of medicine by requiring doctors to swear to uphold the Hippocratic Oath.  This was true for two thousand years, well before unborn babies could be viewed with high tech instrumentation, the likes of 'today's' ultra-sound machines, and well before 1955, which is when Lennart Nilsson commenced his groundbreaking work 50 years ago photographing the preborn baby in-utero, images of which were famously displayed on the cover of, and upon the pages of LIFE Magazine 40 years ago, all the way back in 1965[That was eight years before the majority of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices (all males) infamously perverted the U.S. Constitution and the original intent of the Founding Fathers & Judges, overthrew the body of prior U.S. case law, English Common Law, Natural Law, God's Law, and the Hippocratic Oath, by creating a fictitious absolute constitutional 'right' to do evil, i.e., premeditated murder of the only completely innocent members of society, and incidentally the future of society.  By conspiratorially collaborating in crafting the Roe v Wade & Doe v Bolton decisions which legalized the induced abortion of any and every baby in the nation at any point in gestation from conception until birth for any reason, the Justices created an absolute, man-made right to do evil, and to deliberately destroy the only innocent members of mankind, which overruled, superceded, nullified, and negated all of the self-evident inalienable (unalienable) rights endowed in mankind by their Creator God, upon which this nation was sacrificially founded and maintained.]

    return to ABC-Link information

      One of the Bible passages which God used to inspire the undertaking of the "Loving, Life-sparing" Public Service Campaign 1, to communicate the truth of the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link to the girls, young women, and women of childbearing age being targeted and preyed upon by the Abortion Racketeers.

    Habakkuk 2:2-3

    "And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.  For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry."

    "Loving, Life-sparing" Public Service Campaigns

    "Loving, Life-sparing" Public Service Campaigns

    "Loving, Life-sparing" Public Service Campaigns - theme


    save the mothers, whether girls, or young women, or women, and save their babes too(top of page) what's good for their babies is good for the mothers too, & what's deadly for their babies is harmful for the mothers too!

    going up? (top of page)