With Liberty & Justice for All?! - Abortion Abomination

[The Supreme Courts' Con-Game with the United States Constitution]

Abortion - To Be, or Not To Be; To Destroy, or Not To Destroy; that is The QUESTION!

Is induced abortion/elective abortion, a right?  

Is induced abortion/elective abortion, a wrong?

If abortion is a wrong, can it also be a right, i.e., can a wrong be a right?!

A brief look at what God has to say concerning these supposedly 'modern' matters:

The following quote is from TV Newswoman Cokie Roberts

"I mean, I ALWAYS love the demographic figure on abortion.

The group most pro-choice in the country:

young men between the ages of 18 and 25.

The most responsible group, well known for taking, you know, responsibility for their actions."

(Good Morning America, November 4, 1996)

When is the last time you heard this bit of information during the past 35 years in which induced abortion has been 'legal' throughout the United States of America?  Why do you suppose that is?  As Cokie points out, this has been true for some time!

It might be added that some of these 'pro-choice' 'men' never outgrow their love affair with abortion, e.g., Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Bob Packwood, Chuck Schumer, Grey Davis, Jesse Ventura, Hugh Hefner, Bob Guccionni, Larry Flynt, Ted Turner, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw, Peter Jennings, Bryant Gumbel...numerous United States Supreme Court & Federal Judges, Peter Singer, The "Reverend" Jesse Jackson, Sr., "The Reverend" Al Sharpton...Adolph Hitler, and the list goes on, and on, and on.  & why do you suppose it is that young men between the ages of 18 and 25 are the most pro-choice group in the country?!?

Ultrasound, Sonogram

.  There are medical procedures, treatments, therapies, 'remedies', but all true medicine attends to protecting, preserving, nurturing, nourishing, and prolonging life.

To the "Father of Medicine" Hippocrates, the Art of medicine was dedicated to seeking to heal and cure human beings, his fellow man, of illnesses and diseases.

To deliberately destroy life is the most profound misuse of medical knowledge, and methods, and as such was utterly forbidden within the practice of medicine, by requiring doctors swear to uphold the Hippocratic Oath.

This was true for more than two thousand years, dating back to approximately 400 B.C., well before unborn babies could be viewed with high tech instrumentation, the likes of 'today's' ultra-sound machines, and well before 1955, which is when Lennart Nilsson commenced his groundbreaking work, 47 years ago, photographing the preborn baby in utero -- images of which were famously displayed on the cover of, and upon the pages of, LIFE Magazine in 1965!  Yes I said 1965!

Lennart Nilsson's pictures were, and are, much more spectacular than this one, but this picture still gives irrefutable testimony to the unmistakable humanity of the pre-born baby, created in the image of GOD (not animal, not the accidental [and incidentally impossible] result of chance & billions more years than this young earth has been revolving).

Pre-born babe,   only 14 weeks old (since conception).  First Trimester baby!

When is the last time you read the warning on a bottle of Aspirin?

On Bayer Aspirin it reads, "As with any drug, if you are pregnant or nursing a baby, seek the advice of a health professional before using this product.


Do you want a picture of what abortion really is, look at these pictures of child-bearing, and consider this, won't you:

.  In both cases there is a mother, a mother's body, a baby, a baby's body, blood, always blood, discomfort too, in both cases a woman is nakedly observed by medical professionals in what some, many, or most would find to be an undignified and even humiliating exposure, but there are some significant differences.

For instance: in childbirth the mother and medical professionals are seeking to see the baby safely delivered, brought into this world, and cared for; whereas in abortion the mother and the team of medical professionals are determined that the baby be forced to die, they require that the baby must die (the team is typically predominantly comprised of women).

In abortion the mother's genital tract is rapaciously, and painfully pried open and invaded by instruments of search, seizure, and destruction with which to destroy her baby, unless the abortion is executed via saline solution abortion, Caesarean section abortion, or partial-birth abortion/infanticide.

Again there is always blood, and unlike in birth, in abortion there is always gore (no pun intended, though Gore is a big fan and aggressive proponent of abortion [to 'save' the earth, you know!]).

Yes, in the murder of abortion, premeditatedly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly committed by teams of medical professionals (again, composed chiefly of women), there is always gore, because that is what the destruction of babies bodies entails.

With childbirth there is no sin, embarrassment perhaps, but no sin (additionally there is the joy that the baby has been born).

With abortion there is always sin, profoundest sin, profanest sin, the sin of the murder of innocent, helpless, defenseless babies in sanctuary of their very own mother's wombs!

And this is not to mention the myriad consequences for mothers who succumb to the abortion 'industry,' such as life-long regret, emptiness, guilt...debilitating depression, suicide.

Sin does have consequences, physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, relational consequences; and murder is SIN.

In modern America, the only absolute Right is the fraudulent "right" to willfully do wrong, most exceedingly monstrous wrong, and to disguise it as 'Choice,' to pretend it is safe, to pretend it serves a girl's, a young woman's, a woman's best interests, and therefore is justified, legitimate, respectful (or deserving of respect), honorable, and required in a truly free, modern country.

Only a mother and child?

Pregnant woman, woman great with child, mother and pre-born baby .

A mother and child, before the baby's birth (or before abortion, if you "choose" death for the baby!).

To murder this baby in its mother's womb is perfectly legal in America, utterly immoral and evil, but legal, normal, responsible, advisable, caring and compassionate, sensitive, wise, and above all woman-friendly.

Only a woman's bodyA woman and an "obligate parasite."  Your "Choice" America!

Mother breastfeeding baby, Mother nursing baby, Mother giving baby suck

A mother and child, after a baby's birth (this one escaped the abortionist "industry's" most 'compassionate' efforts; oh well, another day, another few thousand abortions).

To murder this suckling baby is a heinous crime against humanity according to many who 'defend to the death' the 'right' to murder this precious baby while it is in its mother's womb.  Is there perhaps a trace of intellectual dishonesty, hypocrisy, and duplicity on the part of those who decry the murder of babies only after they are born; are they perhaps employing a double-standard?

.  P.S.  What is "induced abortion?"  It is abortion that is forced on the baby, which is understandable after all as "successful abortion" requires utter destruction of the baby, it stands to reason that the babies are not going to be willing participants.  But then as the babies are utterly helpless and dependent, and are captive (rather than protected!) within their mother's wombs, what chance do they have against a team of grown, adult medical professionals armed with tools of destruction operating on the more or less willing mothers to seek and destroy their babies?

Honestly, if abortion isn't murder, what is?

Destruction of babies is something which medical professionals used to be forbidden to do.  The Hippocratic Oath forbade doctors and medical professionals from committing abortion, it forbade them from providing abortifacients, which is what most forms of "birth control" or "contraception" are.  The Hippocratic Oath forbade doctors to destroy human life.  It even forbade them to do wrong (incredible, but true!).  

Yes, it used to be more demanding to be a doctor, that is, they were held to a higher standard.  But "modern" man knows better! right?

The Hippocratic Oath got in the way of Adolph Hitler's "plans."  Hitler dismissed the Hippocratic Oath during the hellish Third Reich.  It has never been observed during any Communist Totalitarian Regime.  Does that surprise you?

The Hippocratic Oath got in the way of Margaret Sanger's "plans;" her plans entailed the destruction of human beings, and the control of whom would be "permitted" to reproduce.  Isn't that interesting, her battle cries and those of her followers have been that women will have control of their sexual reproduction, her relentless campaign has demanded "reproductive rights," and "reproductive freedom" (but not for the babies being reproduced), yet the ultimate accomplishment of Margaret Sanger's plans will include Government determination of who will be "permitted" to reproduce!

You see with Sanger and her followers "reproductive rights" are not the rights for adults to marry and sexually reproduce, but the outrageous wrongs to murder babies, and children, to destroy peoples' capacity to sexually reproduce, to destroy peoples' lives, hopes, dreams, ..., by destroying peoples' ability to marry, to form families, to beget, conceive, and bear children, to raise families.  Yes people, this really is the glorious aim of Margaret Sanger and all of her ilk.  The enslavement they will bring upon all of humankind (if permitted) will make the past evils of slavery pale by comparison.

As an example, Margaret Sanger's plan would forbid Jews and Blacks to reproduce.  Tell me, how long would it take to annihilate a race of people if all sexual reproduction of the members of that race were to be prevented?  Answer, Only until the Current GENERATION Died off; there would be No Later Generations!  

Now that's a plan, a "final solution," that even as results-oriented a leader as Adolph Hitler could approve of.

Then too, how could such sexual reproduction be prevented?  How do you enforce a ban on sexual reproduction, how would Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger enforce her master-minded ban on sexual reproduction by Blacks, Jews,....?  How would our benevolent government at the behest of modern-day Margaret Sangers,  Henry Kissingers, and Rockefellers enforce a ban on sexual reproduction by targeted people groups, such as Christians, especially independent, fundamentalist Christians?

Tell me if you can, how does a government forbid sexual reproduction?  No really, how does one? and at the behest of the very groups that have for so long so vehemently and effectively prevented teaching school-age young people abstinence, on the basis that "it won't work."  The answer is, it can be done in a variety of ways, all entail the use of force or deception, intrigue, and conspiracy!  One method is what you might call the meat axe approach, i.e. castration of boys nearing the age of puberty or who have reached puberty, and of young men, and men, and sterilization of girls who are nearing the age of puberty or who have reached puberty, and of young women, and women of childbearing age; these "operations" can be performed via surgery or irradiation.  The benevolent U.S. Government used this approach some years ago on the girls, young women, and women of childbearing age in Puerto Rico [I believe it was], fully one third of these girls, young women, and women were sterilized without their knowledge, much less their permission!  Interesting experiment don't you think?  But what about their reproductive rights you ask, what about their reproductive freedom, what about their right to conceive and bear children?!.  Oh tisk, tisk, no need to fuss over such trifles as those, not when you are engaged in such a "humanitarian" experiment!  But an alternate, more 'dignified,' sophisticated, technologically advanced, modern method of accomplishing the same result is to see to it that all of the target audiences' food and drinking supplies are laced with chemical contraceptives.  The desired effect again should truly approach zero population growth for the specific sectors of the public, and voila, genocidal annihilation of the targeted groups within one generation!

Quite a planner that Margaret Sanger, you've got to hand it to her, she has enjoyed tremendous success.  During the 28 years in which the Hippocratic Oath has been null and void for all intents and purposes within the United States of America, the rate of black births has been unbelievably radically diminished. Whereas prior to 1970 it was virtually unheard of for black babies to be aborted, since the "legalization" of abortion (which began in California and Washington State prior to the Nation), live births have fallen to ONE IN THREE compared to aborted babies, in other words the legalization of abortion generation among blacks is ONE THIRD the size it should be and would be.  But you and I know that it is Pro-Black to be "Pro-Choice" right?  Think again folks, or to be more to the point, Start Thinking folks.  

Margaret Sanger was one shrewd operator, she knew full-well she would never succeed in selling abortion to the black community without the assistance of black ministers and black churches, so she focused on buying, bribing, seducing, conning, duping, and fooling black ministers, and she succeeded in subverting, undermining, and overthrowing the formerly strong family, strong church, black communities.  It should be mentioned, this tactic has also been used with great effect in the white communities, and now is targeted at the Hispanic/Latino communities.

Do you notice that the fulfillment of Margaret Sanger's plans require the annihilation of your and my Constitutional Rights to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, as well as to property, and indeed the destruction of all of our rights, those enumerated within the Bill of Rights, and those not so enumerated, all of which are inalienable/unalienable, i.e. from GOD.  All true Rights are from GOD, not from man, nor man-made governments.  Governments can confer privileges and benefits and perquisites, but not Rights, and our founders understood this, stated it, wrote it, acknowledged it, and attested to it in the Unanimous Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution of the United States of America, as well as in case-law for the first hundred years of this nation's official existence, ruinously so much of this record has been reversed in recent years by unjust, unrighteous, wicked Judges.

The Oath of Hippocrates or the Hippocratic Oath

.  So you ask me, 'What about all of those women who died as a result of illegal abortion?'

I'm glad you asked?

First, the abortion pushers have always been known to be notorious liars; if this shocks you, consider for a moment, if you avidly advocate murder, is lying going to bother you, is it really?

The numbers of women who died from illegal abortions was premeditatedly, obscenely exaggerated, and the lies are still being repeated nearly 30 years later!  For instance, in the year immediately preceding the 'legalization' of abortion in the United States of America, there were 19 deaths from illegal abortion, yes I said 19.  I understand your astonishment, what about the fabled 10,000 deaths; exactly, a carefully fabricated fable, which is repeated to this day, courtesy of the mainstream media.  Dr. Bernard Nathanson, of abortionist fame can attest and has attested to the fabrication of the 10,000 death lie that he was a party to.

Second, typically the illegal abortions were not the so-called 'back-alley' abortions they were made out to be, but rather they frequently were committed in doctor's offices!

Third, in those 19 cases in which women died as a result of 'botched' abortions, their babies also died, but who was heartbroken over the babies?  And in the myriad illegal abortions which the mothers survived, their babies died; or to be more precise, their babies were murdered, their babies were put to death.  But again, who was heartbroken over the slaughter of these innocent babies? besides God that is.

Fourth, there are demonstrably honorable ways to die, there are neutral ways to die, and there are decidedly dishonorable ways to die.

Honorable ways to die include: dying trying to save your spouse, your child, your baby, your sister, your brother, your mother, your father, your other family member, your neighbor, a stranger, your fellow man....your nation.

Neutral ways to die include: dying in your sleep, while sleeping alone, while sleeping with your spouse...dying while at work (if your work is not evil), dying while traveling, commuting, dying from an illness that has not been caused by immorality on your part...dying from wounds inflicted in an accident or by an attacker.

Dishonorable ways to die include: dying while attempting to commit murder, or kidnapping, and/or rape, or armed robbery, or adultery, or treason, or terrorism, or maiming, or mutilation...dying while drunk driving....

As you can see, dying while attempting to have your baby murdered is not an honorable way to die, it is not a noble way to die...instead it is an exceedingly shameful, grossly dishonorable way to die.

Dying while attempting to abort your baby or attempting to have your baby aborted is a most utterly horrible way to die, not because of the personal suffering, but because of the context of the death, that is the fact that the mother who so dies, is accidentally killed while deliberately attempting to have her baby murdered (and most brutally, barbarically murdered at that).

.  A quotation from a journalist of yesteryear (whom you may have heard of), applies.

"Our republic and its press will rise or fall together. An able, disinterested, public-spirited press, with trained intelligence to know the right and courage to do it, can preserve that public virtue without which popular government is a sham and a mockery.

"A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as base as itself.  The power to mould the future of the republic will be in the hands of the journalists of future generations."

Joseph Pulitzer

.  Why mention the press, you ask?

Just this, the legalization of abortion has been facilitated, has been made possible by precisely the frame of press and journalists, and resultant virtueless, shameful, 'popularly' base government, that Joseph Pulitzer warned of.

Editor's note: By "disinterested," Joseph Pulitzer did not mean uncaring, callous, insensitive, nor heartless...but rather he meant objective, uncorrupted, honest, conscientious...and free from being influenced and controlled by 'special interests' which are opposed to truth, righteousness, virtue, justice, and the good of humanity.

.  Now back to the underlying assumption used in the landmark cases legalizing abortion.

If 'legalized' elective abortion is therapeutic, medicinal, safe...healthful, for the mother (which was the purported basis or rationale for the 'legalization' of induced abortion), then why is the incidence of breast-cancer higher for those who have chosen to abort their babies, or who have had others choose for them to abort their babies?

And how long has the abortion 'industry' known of this heightened breast cancer risk associated with elective/induced abortion? given that the first published findings date back to 1957!

And, if abortion is not therapeutic, medicinal, safe, ...healthful, even for the mothers, then on what foundation does legalized abortion stand, other than the overthrowing of the Hippocratic Oath.

Privacy, you say?  Quite right, murder usually proceeds more smoothly when kept private.

No, you mean a Constitutional right to privacy?  Well whatever is that?  Do you mean a right to privately commit seduction, rape, torture, murder, enslavement, prostitution....  What exactly do you mean by a right to privacy?

Where do you find it in the United States Constitution?

How is it that this fanciful, nonexistent right to privacy reigns supreme, as the one sole absolute Right, when the actual Biblical, Historical, Constitutional Rights of Life, Liberty, and Property are not absolute, but conditional?

How can a fictitious, court-created 'right to privacy' trump the legitimate, genuine, true Rights upon which our entire Judicial System is based, is founded?  How can that be?

How can a contrived 'right' to privacy act as an absolute shield to murder any baby prior to birth?

How can a pipe-dream 'right' to privacy negate the most basic, fundamental, foundational, requisite rights of life and liberty, without which nations and courts would not exist?

How can this same academician-fashioned 'right' negate the cornerstone rights to life and liberty which nations and courts are created to protect?

The answer.  The Law is what the evil men, and evil women, the evil Judges say it is.  The Law is what the evil men, and evil women, the evil politicians say it is.  The Law is what the evil men, and evil women, the evil journalists say it is.  The Law is what the evil men, and evil women, the evil Doctors say it is.  I am truly sorry, but that is the way it is; until God overthrows the evil people who have overthrown judgment, justice, righteousness, truth, mercy, charity, faith, Law, and the fear of GOD.

One day perhaps the truth, that breast cancer prevention can best be summarized as abstaining from abortion/from doing violence to one's preborn babies, will finally be told.  Perhaps.

Unfortunately women in China do not have the freedom, do not have the right, to abstain from abortion.  Neither will girls, young women, and women of child-bearing age in the U.S.A., if the powers that be in the USA's depraved government have their way.  Bloody Red China's forced abortion & forced sterilization program is the model for our future you know; or perhaps you didn't, well now you do.

You see, the ultimate goal of the legalization of abortion, after the facilitation, and taxpayer financing of abortion, and the ever expanding of abortion 'rights,' is the ultimate forcing of abortion (and sterilization) upon all whom the government wills, or to put it another way, the abolition of all true rights to be safe and free from abortion!

Additionally, China actively engages in starving orphans (such as those removed from parents who have had more than their quota of one child per couple/family).

And yes, those 'compassionate' Clintons and Gores do applaud China's solution to the world's woes, and they are doing everything they can to adopt and incorporate these 'progressive' methods in the USA of today and tomorrow, and they have plenty of low friends in high places to help them accomplish their evil deeds, and frankly the attempted accomplishment of this plan is a bi-partisan effort. And you bought that media fed line about bi-partisan being good?

It should come as no surprise to you that abortion 'champions' Al & Tipper Gore, and Christine Todd Whitman are celebrated honorary chairmen for the 'Race for the Cure!'  After all, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, like the other 'breast cancer awareness' & 'breast cancer research' foundations and organizations, is staunchly pro-abortion, and therefore not only can not make the smallest effort to inform girls, young women, and women of childbearing age, let alone the general population of the Abortion - Breast Cancer Link, but in fact goes so far as to deny the ABC-Link. What a truly devastating wrong, what a phenomenally profound evil to perform in the name of seeking a cure for breast cancer.  And especially when you consider that these organizations have direct access and huge persuasive influence with girls, young women, and women of childbearing age who have a family history of breast cancer, who are the members of the families of women who have suffered the ravages of breast cancer.

.  The D & X "Abortion" Procedure, commonly known as Partial Birth Abortion.  What is it?  A matter of "privacy," a "woman's choice" - and if so, a "choice" to what?  Is it a matter of a woman's privacy to be a party to the murder of her baby?  Is it a medical procedure, a compassionate medical treatment, a therapeutic operation, or is it Infanticide?

The D & X or "Partial Birth" Abortion procedure entails: 

        1. The Abortionist using an ultrasound machine to sonographically locate the baby's legs and seize them with forceps.  

        2. The Abortionist pulling the baby into the birth canal by the legs.  

        3. The Abortionist forcibly delivering the baby, except for the baby's head.  

        4. The Abortionist then stabbing scissors into the exposed lower back portion of the baby's skull, at the base of the skull.  

        5. The Abortionist then spreading open the scissors to enlarge the wound in the baby's skull.  

        6. The Abortionist removing the scissors from the baby's skull and thrusting a suction catheter into the wound he or she has made in the baby's skull.  

        7. The Abortionist then suctioning out the baby's brain.

        8. The Abortionist then grasping the baby's hollowed out skull with forceps and crushing it. 

        9. The Abortionist then concludes the grisly slaughter of the baby by tugging, pulling, and tearing the baby's body from its mother's, and all in the name of practicing the "healing art," instead of in fact executing a preborn baby by committing court-sanctioned cruel and unusual punishment of the innocent!

[No wonder the "big guy" who "feels our pain" vetoed the Congressional ban on partial birth abortion when it was sent to him for his signature before it could become law, and then again vetoed it when it was again approved by Congress and sent to him for his signature!  And no wonder that the "big guy" continues to be viewed favorably by most women, and many professing christians!]

The Oath of Hippocrates, or The Hippocratic Oath

I will look upon him who shall have taught me this Art even as one of my parents. I will share my substance with him, and I will supply his necessities, if he be in need. I will regard his offspring even as my own brethren, and I will teach them this Art, if they would learn it, without fee or covenant. I will impart this Art by precept, by lecture, and by every mode of teaching, not only to my own sons, but to the sons of him who has taught me, and to disciples bound by covenant and oath, according to the Law of Medicine.

The regimen I adopt shall be for the benefit of my patients according to my ability and judgment, and not for their hurt or for any wrong.

I will give no deadly drug to any, though it be asked of me, nor will I counsel such, and especially I will not aid a woman to procure abortion.

Whatsoever house I enter, there will I go for the benefit of the sick, refraining from all wrongdoing or corruption, and especially from any act of seduction, of male or female, of bond or free.

Whatsoever things I see or hear concerning the life of men, in my attendance on the sick or even apart therefrom, which ought not to be noised abroad, I will keep silence thereon, counting such things to be as sacred secrets.

The Greek Physician Hippocrates is regarded not as one of the fathers of medicine, but as "The Father of Medicine," and of all of his contributions to medical science or the Art of Medicine, the Oath of Hippocrates is considered to be his greatest legacy to the medical profession.  However, the Hippocratic Oath should rightly be recognized as the precious contribution to humanity that it has proven to be for more than two thousand years, except when it has been overruled by evil men and evil women.

God's Word on Abortion

What does God's Word have to say regarding induced abortion?  What does God say of abortion, what consequences does he say will result from people aborting their babies? (Yes, I did say babies!)

I know, what the Holy Bible has to say concerning such 'modern' and 'unquestionably constitutional' matters as "a woman's right to privacy," and "a woman's right to choose," is held to be 'irrelevant, and immaterial,' on the premise that the Holy Bible is ancient and purportedly 'archaic,' 'passť,' ...and thus allegedly not authoritative; interestingly the very same persons that attempt to invalidate the Holy Bible also consider the United States Constitution to be ancient, archaic, and past its time, though they will not admit this publicly, but instead feign reverence for it while they trample it under foot, even as they wave the Holy Bible for expedient effect to fool the christians in the land, while they ridicule it privately and privately wage war against God and His people. 

Now for a brief look at what God has to say concerning these supposedly 'modern' matters:

Jeremiah 2:34-35

"Also in thy skirts is found the blood of the souls of the poor innocents: I have not found it by secret search, but upon all these.  Yet thou sayest, Because I am innocent, surely his anger shall turn from me.  Behold, I will plead with thee, because thou sayest, I have not sinned."

Ezekiel 20:26

"And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that am the LORD."

Ezekiel 20:30-32

"Wherefore say unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? and commit ye whoredom after their abominations?  For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day: and shall I be inquired of by you, O house of Israel?  As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will not be inquired of by you.  And that which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, We will be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone."

Ezekiel 20:39

"As for you, O house of Israel, thus saith the Lord GOD; Go ye, serve ye every one his idols, and hereafter also, if ye will not hearken unto me: but pollute ye my holy name no more with your gifts, and with your idols."

Micah 6:6-8

"Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, and bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old?  Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, or with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?

"He hath shewed thee, O man what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?"

Habakkuk 2:8-12

"Because thou hast spoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall spoil thee; because of men's blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein.  Woe to him that coveteth an evil covetousness to his house, that he may set his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the power of evil!  Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many people, and hast sinned against thy soul.  For the stone shall cry out of the wall, and the beam out of the timber shall answer it.  Woe to him that buildeth a town with blood, and stablisheth a city by iniquity!"

Zechariah 7:8-12

"And the word of the LORD came unto Zechariah, saying, Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Execute true judgment, and shew mercy and compassions every man to his brother: And oppress not the widow nor the fatherless, the stranger nor the poor; and let none of you imagine evil against his brother in your heart.  But they refused to hearken and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, that they should not hear.  Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the LORD of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets: therefore came a great wrath from the LORD of hosts."

Malachi 4:6

"And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse."


To all people reading this material: no matter how hopeless and desperate your particular case or situation may appear to be, and in truth may be (absent miracles), there is a GOD who knows no impossibilities (Luke 1:37).

When no hope nor help remains, GOD remains true, faithful, and available, through Jesus Christ, to those who will confess their sins, repent of their sins (turn from their sins), and humble themselves before the eternal GOD of creation, of life, of love, of truth, of justice and peace.

Brutally, premeditatedly, cold-bloodedly MURDERED, not killed! [yes, there is a difference!]

Outrages & Abominations, courtesy of the Courts (of course)

Legalizing Pornography, all manner of Pornography...Prostitution

Abortion - To Be, or Not To Be; To Destroy, or Not To Destroy; that is The QUESTION!

Crime & Non-punishment; Violent Crime & Sparing the Murderers & Destroyers

Attorney Client Privilege - Attorneys as Accessories after the fact; Aiding & Abetting crime, Enabling Violence, Murder, & Destruction

With Liberty & Justice for All (homepage of Liberty & Justice chapter)

save the babes and their babies!home (toc)

going up? (top of page)